Lately, there have been more and more cases of morally dubious authors coming to light. What I mean by this moral dubiosity is the idea of a writer – maybe your favourite writer – being revealed to be racist or homophobic, or to have plagiarised other authors’ works. What do you do in this situation? Do you keep buying their books, even though you know they’re using the profits to do things that you think are morally wrong?
This is where the idea of separating art from the artist becomes difficult. Loving a book but finding its author irritating is one thing – we just ignore their presence on social media and avoid talking about them as a person. But when this person, whose books we love, is having a very real, very palpable negative effect on other people – can you still separate them?
One of the most well-known and widely publicised cases of this happening is with Orson Scott Card’s novel Ender’s Game. While Card’s novel might have been fantastic in terms of its ideas about the rise of the internet and the way futuristic technology would develop, his essays about his own personal views reveal a wildly homophobic stance as well as his intentions to use money raised from the sales of his books to support anti-gay organisations. For more information on this, check out this article on the full extent.
And this keeps happening. Cassandra Clare, author of the popular Shadowhunter series, has recently been sued for copyright and trademark infringement. Although in this case the lines between the perceived offense and the actual truth are much more blurred, many readers of Clare’s work are now reconsidering their opinion of her. To see the full list of alleged plagiarisms being presented as evidence, check out this link.
And this doesn’t just exist within the literary world – musicians and their music, artists and their art. Even sports people and their careers. This is, by no means, an exhaustive debate on the situation. I could talk for hours on the different instances of needing to separate people from the things they produce and whether it really is possible. It is, of course, also arguable that if we never read, watched, or listened to things produced by people whose personal opinions we don’t agree with, we would never consume any media ever again. So I suppose what I’m asking you is where the line is? Where is your personal line on separating the writer from their words? Let me know in the comments!
Happy reading!
xoxo